“Somebody
help that man,” I murmur every time I see that video of 78-year-old Bill Iffrig. I learned he is all right and he spoke to the news
people, a little stunned that after all he just got knocked off his feet
instead of the much worse injuries suffered by others who were not exactly in
focus.
Some
wonderful, amazing people did help those around them who were hurt. There are
photos showing them and the people terribly injured. We are all stunned. I say
that then realize that there is someone, somewhere out there, at least one
person who is not stunned. There is someone who thought it should happen
something like this. There was intent. There was intent, apparently, to do more
harm than this.
I
can’t help but want the good people to get more attention than the bad people.
I want the hospital employees and the rescue professionals and the event
organizers and the passers-by, the police and other investigative bodies who
have worked since the moment of the first blast to have heroes’ welcomes and
their names written in history. I can’t help but want the people who worked
carefully to create cheap and deadly chaos to be erased from history, to have
their own sympathizers turn on them, to be overwhelmed with the enormity of
this sin that they bring themselves to justice.
Running
isn’t just an individual sport although it can be solitary. Marathons aren’t
solitary. There are runners, marathoners, “endurers” as Rachel Maddow calls
them.
Cousin
Patti’s husband Bob is a runner. Bob’s family has more than one runner. They
make a family event of their marathons. They have a rhythm of practice, of
attendance, of celebration, of food, of community all marathon-centered. They
compete but define winning their own way, as marathoners can. Few compete for
the first place title. Most compete to conquer their past timings or just the
26 miles themselves. Most run because they run. It’s what they do.
Some
tarot readers define the 5 of Wands as a negative card and you might view the
vigor and seeming disorganization as threatening or mean. I don’t usually. It
might be part of my own orientation to competition in games. When I look at it,
I see competitors trying their skills against worthy opponents in the field of
sport, not battle. They share a common passion for the activity they are thoroughly
engaged in. They have a tacit agreement to participate and test their skills.
They may define their own “personal win” differently but they are likely to
agree on an overall winner. They are likely to want to come back and try again.
Are they mean? I don’t think so. They are participating to win, not
half-hearted, ho-hum energy. But part of the agreement among the competitors is
that the competition is not a life-and-death event.
Alternatively,
the 5 of Swords is the true zero-sum game. This is the victor and the
vanquished. This isn’t a friendly competition. This is the meaningful attack
with the intent, not to prove one’s abilities, but to crush an enemy.
In
one of my classes at Readers Studio one year, I had a chance to really spend
some time with the 5 of Swords. Despite his smirk, the “winner” does not look any happier than the
“losers”. Some look to the other characters in the card to say the apparent
winner ends up losing in the end; the losers end up winning. Somehow I’d like
to think so. The winner gathers up the swords of ideas and conflict and takes
them with him, alone. He has lost friends, people, trust, love and perhaps even
touch with reality, all for the gathering of swords.
The
marathon is an example of the 5 of Wands, the field of play to test one’s
mettle. The act of terror is an example of the 5 of Swords, somehow an idea to
make a statement of violence and power.
With
the 5 of Wands, we can decide we don’t want to compete anymore; the better
competitors may seem too intense for those less competitive. Competition can
seem unkind because it does leave some behind as competition is eliminated. But
almost everyone agrees that the players can come back and try again tomorrow,
if they want to.
With
the 5 of Swords, however, the intent is different, not sporting, but power
driven, with the intent to do harm to one’s opponents for a “permanent”
victory. An idea triumphs over another. An argument is won and lost. Someone exercises
violence for gain of…something. War is waged.
I
checked with my friends who work in Boston today. Their offices are near the
blast point. For safety, they worked from home today. I was happy to learn they
were not injured.
The
many professionals who track down criminals are very, very focused and
motivated to find those who did this. When they find them--when, not if--it will not necessarily feel like victory, no more,
perhaps, than putting out the trash on Wednesday night.
But
the marathoners will be back, because the spirit of community and celebration
of joy and the love for those maimed or lost cannot, will not be beaten, even
by the evil done this week.
Go
Boston.
Best
wishes.
It's made me think once again about good vs. evil, and how it played out at the Boston Marathon. SO MANY people stepped up to help strangers.
ReplyDeleteYou might remember that Stanford Prison Experiment, where they got "volunteers" to be prisoners and guards. The guards were encouraged to be cruel to the prisoners, and became so awful so quickly that they had to stop the experiment. Well the man who ran that experiment turned to studying what makes people heroes.
His conclusion was just as evil can become banal, and if we see others doing evil we're more inclined to join in, the reverse is true. All it takes is one person to step up and be a hero, and others will follow. Maybe that's what happened in Boston. He did a great presentation on Prezi about the jouney from evil to good here: http://prezi.com/1audtzyxqmmv/my-journey-from-evil-to-heroism/